Sunday, 15 April 2012

Symbolic Coordinates of Southeast European Space

Abstract
Space is a phenomenon belonging to both the natural and the spiritual world. This is why people act according to the fundamental features of space, establishing complex organization systems. So, whenever one is conducting a research about space he cannot ignore the attitude of spirit in front of the physical world, which generates symbolic meanings that might be used in order to analyze people’s relation to the context. Emerging from symbols, it is very interesting to notice what people traditionally mean by “good place” and “bad place” and what makes us distinguish them today. Several issues in the paper will exemplify the general tendency in two different locations of the Greek-Albanian Border area. Aspects like religious edifices, public space, name, defense, path, signs of modernity reveal, through their symbolic content, the connection established between people and place at one moment and how they modify the condition of that place according to their perception about its intrinsic power… enforcing its primary character rather than changing it by contemporary artificial means.
 

1.                   Space. Place. Settlement.
Space is a phenomenon belonging to both the natural and spiritual world. It has an objective existence, being at the same time, a fundamental dimension of people’s way of thinking- a frame, a category and an elementary explanation form.
In order to find out people’s relation to space, we have to consider, first of all, a finite dimension, dominated by easily recognizable guide marks. Due to its definition through additional elements, space becomes qualitative in relation to objects. This finite part of space represents the place, which people are consubstantial with, as the connection between them comes from the past. Places are subject to deliberate actions of human groups, being transformed into shelters for themselves and their activities. This is how people generate the human settlements, whose definition varies from one author to another. However, constants in these definitions remain the finite character of the settlement and its delimitation - the two most relevant aspects when describing its inner and outer relations.
Between people and place there might be more than a relation, there might be a spiritual kinship, which could constitute both a cause and a consequence of the associative life that appeared at one moment in history.
2.                   People and the context
People think and act according to the fundamental features of space, often generating complex organization systems, based on its specific character, so space research may not ignore all the subtle relations that explain the attitude of spirit in front of the material world. Based on this attitude, we can identify symbols that offer interesting interpretations when analyzing the way people relate to a certain context.
3.                   About the local
Delimiting space, based on well established rules, and operating within a limited space, according to specific aspects, is what creates the local. The lure of the local is not a simple nostalgia of an existence based on the position of the settlement, but a strong political and emotional argument in the perception of the local in a complex society.
Knowing the unique character of the border regions, the study will focus on two Greek settlements - Molivdoskepastos and Kalovrisi, in the Greek-Albanian border area. In this case, two terms must be defined: border and neighborhood. From an anthropological point of view, we are presented the neighborhood as an extension or a complement of the familial space which it surrounds, including people in a larger, but organic unit. The same source lets us know that the borderline indicates to people where a certain place ends, enclosing the familiar world and opening the unknown one.
4.       Strong place. Weak place.
As the representation of space depends to a great extent on how certain elements are spread, it also depends on their simple presence within that space. The presence of these elements is a result of the process which allows people to enrich the place they live with personalized features, generating a specific dynamic of the landscape as an echo of their identity.
The landscape is always unstable, it often has multiple meanings and, although it is permanently subject to relations of power and control, the landscape can never be considered a property. Public or private space, public or private property and even landscape are bearing the footprints of the so-called “property on identity”. In other words, landscape, identity and property are inseparable. The lure of the local can be noticed in people’s effort to personalize the space and it is nothing but the action of generating the possibility of revealing identity.
Ethnographic studies often use the distinction between good place and bad place, between strong places and weak places, which represents a challenge in the interpretation of symbolic coordinates of different places.
In this context, the strong place can be understood as a personalized place, whose community sets witnesses of the local character through the organization of specific elements. This is why we will consider several aspects specific to both of the villages mentioned above: name, religious edifices, public space, private space, sings of modernity. All of these issues will be separately analyzed and interpreted in a comparative manner. 







1.       The way to a collective representation
If space is influenced by the position or the form of elements and by the directions or the local events, then the space itself affects everything it surrounds. This ability of the space to determine its own content through time is nothing but its intrinsic power.
All the signs that prove a personalized place, all the modifications and changes provided by people follow this intrinsic power of the place rather than interfere with it. In fact, every human being perceives only the reality detected and interpreted on his own. This modal interpretation is possible due to the symbols translated by the human subjectivity, so the only relevant relation is established between the individual representation of space and the collective representation, generated by the members of the community at one moment in time. This is how space becomes a constant in the way people perceive the world, a  constant that people articulate according to their spiritual needs.

No comments:

Post a Comment